What makes scientific journal articles appeal to Human Factors and Ergonomics professionals ?

Background: Human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) is an applied discipline and a profession that demands ecologically valid and practical research. However, there is concern that while HF/E research may be meeting the needs of researchers, it may not have fully met the needs of practitioners nor made a high impact on practice in the ‘real world’. This suggests that there may be a discordance between what researchers and practitioners perceive as important in HF/E research publications. Aim: Sternberg and Gordeeva examined journal articles characteristics that may have an impact in psychology. The current study aimed to determine the characteristics that make scientific journal articles appeal to HF/E researchers and practitioners. Method: Participants were recruited for a web-based questionnaire via appeals to 47 IEA-federated HF/E Societies, ‘invitation to participate’ notices on LinkedIn HF/E groups, and individual emails to LinkedIn members and professional contacts. Results: Well-written and reader-friendly journal articles are appreciated across disciplines, regardless of work roles. HF/E researchers and practitioners place a higher importance on the practical significance of journal articles than psychologists, and this is particularly important for HF/E practitioners. Conclusion: This research has provided an insight into the attributes that HF/E researchers and practitioners look for in a good journal article, providing guidance for authors on how to better tailor their publications to the needs of their intended audience. HF/E researchers and practitioners may be more similar than expected in what they believe to be important journal article attributes. ©Chung et al: Licensee HFESA Inc.